Last week we looked at my point and it is fairly clear to see that i am right but i think i will humor the opposition and disprove them once again and no i am not being cocky as i am always right. Anyway this time we have website which states hat animal testing is wrong because the tests do not properly correlate to actual effects on humans. The authors points out the example that chickens cannot get the cold while humans can and yet we test cold medicines on chickens for our own amusements just to see what will happen.
First let me say off that i don't care if we test a medicine on chickens, dogs or even rocks for that matter. The point is that the scientists are being amused and that they are enjoying themselves. Second the scientists are not checking whether the chickens imaginary cold will be gone or not instead they are checking what effect the drug has on the chickens heart lungs and livers. They are making sure that the drug is not lethal or does not cause any ill effects. They are not doing this for fun but they can if they want to instead they actually have a purpose which the author of the article totally wrongly misunderstood and therefore he has shown how little knowledge he has and now is not credible. So once again I am proven correct.
Reuvanth:
ReplyDeleteWhile your own opinion is clearly present, what's needed here is a clearer paraphrase of the actual views. You have 'leapfrogged' this important process, and in so doing, your own credibility is diminished. Also, look at actual authored sources, in addition to more general positions, like those of PETA's.
+15/20
Mr. Heller